Posted March 2, 2007, by old_iron_bridge

Amen to that brother. The web page header should read, " Historic Repeating Bridge Photos of Fred Garcia."

Posted March 2, 2007, by Marty Myers (conductor_mtm [at] yahoo [dot] com)

A walkway for railroad workers was added in 1999.

Posted March 2, 2007, by Marty (conductor_mtm [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This bridge is still in use by the Union Pacific Railroad and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad on a daily basis.

Posted March 2, 2007, by Anonymous

Has this web site become the Fred Garcia redundant photo page or what?

Posted March 1, 2007, by riverratttt47w (riverratttt47w [at] yahoo [dot] com)

you neede to put a schedule

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 3317 bytes

Posted March 1, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 11:00 a.m. on 01 March 2007. This stream is unmarked on the highway. There is no way to tell that there is an open spandrel concrete arch below the deck, unless you get out of your vehicle and start down the embankment at either abuttment. Clear water stream. There is a downstream gravel bar but essentially its impossible to get a photo of the entire bridge from a profile view. Guardrails seem rather flimsy. Some old concrete segments that were once part of the bridge lay at the foot of abuttments.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted March 1, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 2:00 pm on 19 November 2006. Hardly seems like a place to find a bridge like this. Creek was dry. Many deer carcasses strewn about. There was some cribbing on the north end before the abutment.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted March 1, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 3:00 pm on 19 November 2006. Guardrail on the north end (left side) is bent away. Profile photo was not easily obtainable due to overgrowth. Water was sluggish to stagnant.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted March 1, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 4:00 pm on 19 November 2006. Much of the decking towards the middle of this bridge is missing and would be dangerous to attempt crossing. The west approach is significantly decayed and hanging at a 30 degree angle. Was able to get down in the river channel for photos from the gravel bar. Hunting leases exist on the road to the bridge.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted March 1, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 3:15 pm on 18 Nov. 2006. Good photos can be taken from the downriver city park on the west bank and from the west approach. I noticed that some of the overhead spreaders have some deformation as if struck by a high clearance vehicle. The railroad bridge is visible about 200 yards downstream.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 4:30 pm on 11 Nov. 2006. Had trouble locating this bridge as it is not visible from a road. I even asked the gate watchman at the Petit Jean Poultry truck yard for directions, but he didn't know about it even though its only about 1/4 mile behind their facility. I took a side road and parked at a maintenance yard at a RR crossing and walked about 1/2 mile down the tracks to the bridge. About 10 box cars are static on the bridge making it awkward to get around. They occupy 90% of the bridge. Had to carefully walk on laced girder. Getting pictures was exceedingly difficult because of all the understory growth.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 3:30 pm on 11 Nov. 2006. The banks of the Petit Jean were silty slick from recent rise. There is a lot of vegetation obstructing this bridge and it stands fairly high in the trees, making it difficult to get good photos. It looks naked without approaches or decking.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visted this bridge at 2:30 pm on 11 Nov. 2006. This bridge is very photographable from most locations on either end. It is narrow, for I can open both front doors on my Toyota Corolla and they will touch the guardrails.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 5 Nov. 2006 at 4:30 pm. The east bank approach is scoured significantly but one can still manage to get across. Some grafitti evident at various locations. There are some holes in the deck. Best access to bridge is from west approach. Good pictures can be taken from beneath the replacement bridge and also from the the upstream side gravel bar of the old bridge.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Anonymous

I believe this bridge is scheduled for or in the process of being replaced. Reading some Kentucky news and road info there are articles on this taking place. Also I may have read that the new bridge could possibly be a modern through truss. I could be wrong if it turns out to be a boring plane girder bridge.

Foxburg Bridge (Pennsylvania)
Posted February 28, 2007, by Randy Brush

Railroad was top on truss bridge. Track was removed. Highway is lower on truss bridge and open on traffic. Scheduled for replacement in future.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Randy Brush

Scheduled for replacement in 2010. open on traffic with weight limit two ton. no truck alloe on bridge.

Posted February 28, 2007, by Randy Brush

Scheduled for replacement in 2015. I-71 will move new bridge over Ohio River. I-75 will stay on Brent Spence Bridge or new wide bridge after 2015.

Posted February 27, 2007, by Kathy Wood (lacasita [at] pacbell [dot] net)

ooking for inofrmation on Edward Durkin Found murdured on Sag Bridge may 13, 1894

Posted February 26, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 5:30 pm on 25 Feb '07. Arrived almost at sunset, but I got a few decent photos from each side and through the windshield as I drove across. Lee creek was up from rain the day before so profile views were out of the question. Upstream of this bridge is Natural Dam that is so close, if you don't visit you've missed out big time. It is a pretty spot with a 4' cragy ledgedrop, and a low-water bridge just below it. A nice picnic area with ample parking is adjacent to the falls.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 26, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Vistited this bridge at 3:00 pm on 25 Feb 2007. Coming in from the west end, I noticed the sign reads Centerville Rd. The bridge is about 1/2 mile off Hwy 215. This long, narrow bridge seemed sturdy when walked across. The asphalt surface is lumpy and deteriorated and the corregated substrate can be seen in places. There's a borrow pit on the west side from which pictures can be taken. Being a long bridge, one has to get fairly far away to get a profile photo of the entire 3 spans. The county road on the east side allows one to get closer by vehicle than the west side. No builders placard noted on structure. A large gravel island has been building upstream from the center pier.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Ozark Bridge (Arkansas)
Posted February 26, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 1:00 p.m. on 25 Feb 2007. The main steel arch span can best be photographed from the lawn behind the hospital on the north bank. Another good photo spot is a Mexican Restaurant on the south downstream bank. The RR tracks below the bridge were lined with rail/track maintenance vehicles/equipment (about 1/2 mile string of them) that really stood out on that bank. This bridge is difficult to photograph due to it's incredible length. To get a profile view, I had to walk a 1/2 mile down the tracks; but essentially one's too far away to get a decent image. Structurally, the steel span seems fairly unique in construction. It was nicely fitted to the existing concrete arches.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 25, 2007, by Anonymous

Visited this bridge on 7 Nov 2006 at 12:30 pm. This bridge appears to be in excellent serviceable condition and can be photographed from either approach and from the modern replacement 100 yds. upstream. Nice to see an old bridge with a color other than "rust". The deck was covered with fall leaves.

You are right, it's nice to see one of these bridges with a good paint job for a change. That's how I remember these types of bridges being, during the 1960s when we used so many of them in the Chicago area. It's like going back in time to see the great pictures you've given us here. Thanks.

Posted February 25, 2007, by Gary Hudes (ghudes [at] comcast [dot] net)

Several images of this bridge at sunrise during winter 2007

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 1483499 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 1008545 bytes

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visted this bridge on 7 Nov. 2006 at 2:00 pm. I had visited this bridge about 15 years ago and it has deteriorated considerably. The old road bed has been blocked and is overgrown on the east side. A large section of deck planks are missing from the west side. One 10 or 12 ft. plank has been relocted to be able to walk across "CAREFULLY". Leaf litter accumulation was considerable and has accelerated decay. It is still worth seeing and studying. It cannot be seen from the county road except during "leaf off". Not visible from replacement bridge 200 yds. upstream.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 7 Nov 2006 at 12:30 pm. This bridge appears to be in excellent serviceable condition and can be photographed from either approach and from the modern replacement 100 yds. upstream. Nice to see an old bridge with a color other than "rust". The deck was covered with fall leaves.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Fry Bridge (Arkansas)
Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 7 Nov. 2006 at 3:15 pm. There is plenty of annoying grafitti on the main structural members and on the weight limit signs. Several vehicles crossed this bridge while I was there. Difficult to get a good profile photo because of overgrowth and Point Remove Creek was big at the time. Bridge appears to be sound. I see that this bridge is claimed to be built in 1890. Doesn't seem that old, but ...

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 11:15 a.m. on 12 Jan. 2007. This bridge has a continous concrete surface poured over the old wood decking whose boards are visible from the edge. There is good access to both banks on the downstream side. The day I was there, there was fog on the river, making for interesting photos. This bridge is open to traffic but doesn't appear to be frequently used.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 11:45 10 Feb 2007. Fairly good photos can be taken for either bank at east or west side on the bank. Also from the Narrows Marina & the Narrows Rec. Area. This is a long bridge, painted a muted green and has a pipeline slung to the west side.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 5:30 pm on 29 October 2006. Crossed over it to get to the other side of Old River Bridge which is 100 yds. upstream. The bridge is active as two trains crossed the bridge (one in each direction) while I was out there.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 24, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge 29 October 2006 about 5:30 pm. Not able to get on bridge itself, but there is a RR bridge about 100 yds. downstream that I crossed to the other side for additional pictures. It's a little weedy around the north approach and some of the trestle is still in place which is another good spot to take photos of the deck.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 23, 2007, by Anonymous

This bridge has now been removed.

Posted February 23, 2007, by dave bathie (davidbathie [at] yahoo [dot] com)

LOOKING EAST TOWARDS THE BRIDGE-JUST BEFORE RENOVATIONS WERE COMPLETED.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, comment:

Rock Bridge (Illinois)
Posted February 22, 2007, by Greg Myers (cjournal [at] egyptian [dot] net)

If anyone has more information about this bridge please contact me. 618-497-8272

Posted February 22, 2007, by james Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

I called the City of Spring City today to ask about this bridge. It was torn down 1-2 months ago. It no longer exists :(

Posted February 22, 2007, by Robert Brown (kansas57 [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge was once a through truss with a lift span to allow steamboats to pass on the Osage River. The plate girder decks replaced the through trusses in the 1990s (or thereabouts). I haven't been there for quite a while, but I read that the UP wanted to add a second parallel bridge to eliminate a bottleneck caused by two lines from each direction having to go down to one at the bridge. They wanted to use the steel from the old MKT bridge at Boonville, but a deal by one state agency to sell the state-owned bridge at Boonville to the UP has been blocked by another agency that wants to preserve the MKT bridge for use by the Katy Trail (hike-bike trail using the old MKT right-of-way that now detours over the US 40 bridge to reach Boonville).

Posted February 22, 2007, by Robert Brown (kansas57 [at] gmail [dot] com)

Love this site.

The bridges over the Missouri at Washington, Hermann, and Boonville (lost) and the lost bridges over the Mississippi at Hannibal and Cape Girardeau were all designed by the engineering department under the direction of Leif Sverdrup at the Mo Dept of Highways and Transportation (now DOT). Sverdrup went onto lead the Army engineers under MacArthur in the Pacific in WW II and came home and started an engineering and construction company in St Louis that is still in business.

Posted February 21, 2007, by Jason Triplett (jdtriple [at] hotmail [dot] com)

The Nyberg Bridge was replaced in 2005 with a 2-span prestressed girder bridge.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 417856 bytes

Posted February 21, 2007, by Jason Triplett (jdtriple [at] hotmail [dot] com)

The Avondale Bridge was replaced in 2005 with a 2-span prestressed girder bridge.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 45.025, 93 15.974

Plaque photo didn't come out,didn;t record while there, sorry.

Photo 1: Looking East

Photo 2: looking east

Photo 3: Under east bank approach, looking west

Photo 4: Looking west

Photo 5: West abutment, little fuzzy

Photo 6: East abutment

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 37.127, 93 23.214

Photo 1: North side looking east

Photo 2: South side looking east

Photo 3: south side

Photo 4: Looking east

Photo 5: looking west

Photo 6: damage north/west corner

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo 7:East side from north bank

Photo 8: North supports. Rear one bowed slightly

Photo 9: Under looking south

Photo 10: North bank support. Steel rusted at bottom,rivets missing in places

Photo 11: lower joint

Photo 12: South/East support

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 42.147, 93 24.454

Neat bridge. Larger than the other Canton Bridge Company bridges in our area. Longer span as well. Not sure if the larger frame is due to higher load carrying or longer span or both.

Photo 1:South bank looking east

Photo 2: Looking north

Photo 3: Plaque

Photo 4: Looking north

Photo 5:Bridge has been redecked recently. Vines have been cut that had been growing inside the frame

Photo 6: Looking south

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 33.262, 93 18.434

Photo's of west abutment. East abutment is gone.

Photo 1: taken from new bridge

Photo 2: Looking East. Concrete placed where deck surface used to be. Railing on approach in different

Photo 3: East abutment, railing

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 37.648, 93 32.579

Photo 1: South side looking east. Note damage to railing

Photo 2: Inventory number?

Photo 3: South side railing damage

Photo 4: Water damage west bank, north side

Photo 5: North side looking east

Photo 6: Looking east

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo 7: East side looking north

Photo 8: Under looking north

Photo 9: South approach ramp and south support

Photo 10: Approach ramp, odd slight downward angle

Photo 11: Icy bluff, south/east side. No railing, only cable

Photo 12: Looking south

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Actual GPS 37 58,794 93 18.686

Regarding the questionm mark with bridge open? Maybe this is the deal. Road to the bridge is poorly designed. Road runs east/west, but actually runs north/south where the bridge is. Approach from the east/south is on top of a bluff, shaded by trees. The first photo shows the sign regarding the weather issues (facing west). From that photo one can see to the 90 degree right hand corner. Look carefully where the road fades away and snow is evident. that was a sheet of solid ice, due to low sunlight exposure. It might have snowed here a week or so ago and still hadn't melted. Road turns 90 degrees right and immediately drops sharply down and onto the bridge. It would be impossible to guide a car and aim it on solid ice to be properly aligned with the bridge.

Thinking back to the original days when the bridge was likely built, I cannot imagine a team of horses with a loaded wagon climbing the south hill, or going down it! This poor road design may preserve the bridge more than naything else, simply as this makes the entire road of limited use, with or without a new bridge.

I am guessing that this bridge is open at other times, pending only the weather. Deck is aged, but solid. The approach ramp (south bank) takes large loads when vehicles drop off the hill and bottom out on it. The approach ramp aims slightly downward and I am not entirely sure if that is a result of damage repair, or original design.

Photo 1: Looking west. Snow/ice in road, road turns sharply right as it drops out of sight and sharply goes down.

Photo 2: Looking south at the uphill on the bridge (this would be downhill after the corner.

Photo 3: Looking South

Photo 4: Side shot, looking south, west side of the bridge.

Photo 5: Looking south through bridge

Photo 6: Looking north. Note the downward angle of the approach ramp

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo 7: Lower joint, east end, north side where approach ramo meets bridge deck.

Photo 8: East Approach ramp, north side

Photo 9: East abutment, south side

Photo 10: Heading west

Photo 11: Deck wear and tear on south side of approach ramp. Deck seems to be wooden boards with asphalt on top. While we were there, water was dripping from beneath bridge, but surface was dry, which suggests that the boards are sitting in moisture a fair amount of the time.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS 37 49.146, 93 37.310

Too many photo's, you pick the one's you prefer

Photo 1: Name Plate- 1908, Marcus Bridge?, and Iron Works?, Peoria, IL?

Photo 2: Heading East

Photo 3: North side, heading east

Photo 4: West Bank Abutment

Photo 5:Under looking East

Photo 6: Upper joint, north side, east end

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Randy Brush

I am remember the railroad bridge long time. The train was no longer use on bridge for rest of place. three truss bridge was demolished at Big Sioux River in East Sioux Falls, South Dakota. It was by Union Bridge Co. 1897. It track was removed.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday 17 Feb 2007 at 5:45 pm. Getting close to this bridge was no easy matter. I tried various routes on dirt roads & levee's before I found on dirt levee road near the Lock & Dam. As one approaches the rails, the road is posted "Private No Tresspassing" but it is not gated and you can drive right to the AR river bank at the west approach of the bridge. This is probably the road that would be used by the lift span operator, unless this process is completely automated. This railroad bridge is very long and gangly, and has multiple configurations. A locomotive was towing a long string of railcars through the bridge when I arrived. Since I got there at sunset and didn't have a tripod, my photos are a bit off, but there is a lot of bridge here, for sure. Well worth seeing.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren GIlmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo #7: County inventory #?

Photo #8: Heading south

Photo #9: West side looking north

Photo 10: Heading north

Photo 11: Deck damage where approcah ramps meet bridge. Both lanes , both ends are in thnis condition. This channels water to cause the damage noted in photo #5

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

As always, I will post too many photo's and let you decide which ones should be used to document the bridge.

actual GPS 37 29.205, 93 15.845

Photo 1: West side looking south

Photo 2: West side looking south

Photo 3: Water damage to water drain areas/west side

Photo 4: East side looking South

Photo 5: Water damage where North ramp meets bridge deck

Photo 6: Note offset arches. Bridge is not quite square with the stream. East arch is more south than west arch is.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Tull Bridge (Arkansas)
Posted February 20, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited the Tull Bridge on Saturday 17 Feb. This bridge would have intersected with the modern bridge on the west approach. The modern replacement bridge has a bronze plaque indicating it was built 2005 and they are 30 degrees apart from each other. The Tull bridge appears to be ready to be plucked off its piers by a crane from the replacement bridge. I'm glad this is not the case. The galvanized guardrails on the old bridge detract immensely from its character. I would suggest replacing these with period related iron. It will be a great place when developed as a park by the city, given its peculiar angle to the replacement bridge; which is now heavily grafittied. There was more traffic on this highway than I had anticipated - could have been because it was another mild winter day.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Bobby Lamb (bobbylamb [at] prodigy [dot] net)

I was born on the bayou within a few miles of this old bridge in 1947. I remember having to slow down as we crossed it. The timbers would creak and pop. The truck would rock back and forth with the rise and fall of the runners. Here and there we would see gaps in the planks and think about what it would be like if the bridge fell through or if we ran off it. That made for nightmares in later life.

There was an old railroad trestle that crossed the bayou not far away from the bridge. Once, we saw that the old train that ran between Star City and Gould and the trestle had crashed into the bayou.

Within a radius of about six or seven miles there were at least three other similar bridges that crossed the bayou. At some, the school bus would stop and let the children walk across the bridge before the bus crossed. It took a lot of effort to maintain these old bridges. But they were the kind that made a kid's heart pound as they approached them.

Bob Lamb, now in Pine Bluff, Arkanss.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 18 Feb 2007 at 5:30 pm. Had a little trouble locating it. There is a boat launch ramp next to it. A pickup truck and an ATV were parked on a side road on the flood plain. This is a long bridge and seems to be in pretty good shape except for missing running boards. A tributary creek merges nearby. Interesting use of hanger bars near the ends instead of full length criss-cross uprights. Pony truss on one approach. Remnants of a rope swing hangs from the upper truss. Noticed an auxillary culvert next to one abuttment with stacked flat rock facing. Silty/sandy banks. Dump truck loads of creek gravel/rock at both approach roads keep bridge closed to all but pedestrians.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Anon (Anon)

This is not a historic structure. It is not even eligible.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 18 Feb 2007 about 5 pm. The approaches have a top covering of what appears to be conveyor belt material about 2 to 3 ft. wide. There are missing running boards and several rotted holes in the decking. This bridge was so close to the modern replacement bridge, that I passed by it without seeing it till I came back across the replacement bridge. Was able to get photos from every side and from the replacement.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge 18 Feb 2007 about 4:00 pm. A mild winter day to be in the Ozark Nat'l Forest, after stopping at Mt. Magazine State Park. About 1" of water was flowing down the spillway, but there was a dry margin on either side to walk along. North approach is on a sharp curve. A small parking lot on the north end allows access to trail for hiking the perimeter of Cove Lake.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Donald L. Putman (dputman [at] netzero [dot] com)

I crossed this bridge going to and from Mena, Arkansas, to visit my relatives. This bridge was painted blue. It was a small truss, however a landmark. It's a shame to demolish it.

Posted February 18, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

The second span of this bridge was demolished sometime before 18 Feb 2007.

Posted February 16, 2007, by Anonymous

Interesting. I grew up in Lockport, Illinois. There is a lock on the canal there. We used to have two, through truss swing bridges there. One of them is mentioned on this web site. Also, the 135th street bridge mentioned in Romeoville is nicely preserved along the side of the canal now days. It is interesting to hear from a resident of another Lockport. I think there is a Lockport New York, also.

Posted February 16, 2007, by Thor

I thought this was a cool photo from the top of the Carew Tower in Cincinnati.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 686330 bytes

Posted February 15, 2007, by Mary Lynn

As a citizen of Lockport, I would like to state that this bridge needs to have the rust taken care of and needs to be repainted badly. A group of citizens, quite a while back, tried to scrape off as much of the rust as possible and then it was painted. This was done only on the thoroughfare section. We did not go on the outside of the bridge nor under the bridge.

It really needs to have a professional job done NOW to preserve this historic bridge.

Posted February 15, 2007, by Harvey Henkelman (makechoochoogonow (at) msn (dot) com)

A sad story indeed, but it seems as if America itself is ashamed of it's own history. Anything more than a week old would be razed if it were up to many people -- that's why America has little culture or tradition.

Posted February 15, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

The bridge rehab is on schedule and scheduled to open in September 2007. I'll be there!

Posted February 15, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

As I was driving in Dayton January 29, 2007. The bridge no longer exists.

CA 89 Bridge (California)
Posted February 14, 2007, by betsy frauto (yahho [dot] dn)

you need pictures in the internet.

Posted February 14, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Those welded marks on the compression member are likely high water marks from floods in the region.

Posted February 13, 2007, by Susan Barker (subarker [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Enjoyed your website. Still have photos to review. I live in Maeystown. Are you aware we have 30 or so stone arch bridges in our county!

Susan

Posted February 13, 2007, by David Birckhead (david_birckhead [at] hotmail [dot] com)

These photos are ones I took on 4 Sept 06, in the Idaho town of Glenns Ferry where this bridge is located.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1356759 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1343853 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1373681 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1348448 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1364762 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1366738 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

This bridge is scheduled for replacement in Spring of 2008, provided they can get the money. A group of concerned citizens is working currently to get the bridge listed on the NRHP.

Posted February 13, 2007, by Dan Reitmeyer (danreitmeyer [at] charter [dot] net)

This bridge has been totally rehabilitated and re-aligned to make a curve safer at the ends of the bridge

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 650637 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 600751 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by Dan Reitmeyer (danreitmeyer [at] charter [dot] net)

Repairs on the Boner road bridge are complete

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1499491 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1381527 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1385008 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken in 1997.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 37491 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here is a picture of the westernmost span that was taken after the rest of the bridge was demolished.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 39942 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Pictures taken in 2000.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 45715 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 41687 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken after the bridge was closed, in 1997.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 65599 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken from the east end of the bridge in 1997. I assume the ramp was added for the filming of "Sling Blade".

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 63609 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here are a couple of snaps that I took in 1997 of this gone but not forgotten span. It sure was narrow!

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 60078 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 54682 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here is a picture of this bridge taking in 1995. The road is former US 59 and at one time was also US 270.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 44746 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Jim Logan (jjimmi [at] gmail [dot] com)

all photod taken Jan 2007

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3278722 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 2960564 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3131786 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3415121 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Kent Findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

The causway spans were replaced with precast concrete in 1997 and the truss and girderspans were rehabilitated in 1997. In the 60s a three lane sister bridge was built alongside to the east.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 4794011 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb. 2007 at 3:30 pm.

This bridge is at the very end of a county dirt road that may only be used by one person (farmer). Once you go over the bridge, the road abruptly ends at a cattle gate.

This Pony truss is different in construction than most. It is mostly bolted together but also has some riveting. The wooden guardrails have rotted away long ago and have never been replaced. The wooden decking and running boards are in good shape.

There is an old barking dog on the other side but not agressive. Whoever lives out there has their own historical bridge that is probably county maintained. I was sturdy to drive across.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb 2007 at 2:00 pm. Good pictures can be taken from the east or west ends and also from the adjacent marina.

This brige is poetry in motion as its spans loop accross Self Creek. Reminds me of a Slinky "walking" across the floor. Lake Greeson's water level was up when I visited.

Lake water was clean and blue and a couple of miles down Hwy 70 where the Little Missouri River enters Lake Greeson, there is a pretty Corps of Engineers campground named Star of the West.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb. 2007 at 1:00 pm. This bridge has been bypassed by a modern bridge that is not near as attractive as the single concrete arch of the Old US 70 bridge.

Lot of graffeti on the substructural concrete spandrels. Even located an 20" BMX bicycle that has tumbled down the creek and whose bent wheels are clogged with leaf debris.

Clear running creek is shallow and tranquil. Guardrails are rusty but sound. Easy access to creek from eiher side.

Several vehicles drove accross as I was poking around in the creek bed. Usually I like to pick up a couple of flagstones from the gravel bars; good stepping stones for the garden.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 25 Nov. 2006 at 2:30 pm. I drove around a bit looking for it and in the process found an interesting low bridge a couple of miles upstream on the same creek.

This is an a different use of a Pony truss especially on such a wide location; although creek is shallow. Some locals were gathering rocks below the bridge for a home patio. The lady talked about cringing every time her school bus rumbled along that bridge.

Seemed sound to me as I heard two vehicles clattering across. Nice broad gravel bar beneath bridge - great spot for picnicing.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Kent Findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

I am suprised a bridge like this exists on long Island

Picture 1 is from the east looking west and picture 2 is the wooden deck

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 5831149 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 5788888 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 23 Jan. 2007 at 4:00 pm. Very attractive setting on a slow bayou. One can drive across and go to a turn around area and park.

This is a nice replica of a covered bridge. The supporting girders are large steel I-beams, otherwise its constructed of all wood components; 'cept the roof shingles.

There is a gazebo upstream and another low footbridge downstream. A hiking/jogging trail starts into the woods on the north side.

Romantic feel, almost want to uncork a bottle of wine and slice up some cheese.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pic of current bridge with old bridge from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 802848 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Pics available from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

View attachment #1 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 448533 bytes

View attachment #3 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 605263 bytes

View attachment #5 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

View attachment #6 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pics available at http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 1266493 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 972372 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1098452 bytes

View attachment #4 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pics available from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 47082 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 49263 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 78862 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by kent findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

I was on the way back from upstate and had a little time so I stop and took this picture.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 833772 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Pics of bridge from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 42057 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 53528 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous
Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Picture of bike trail under bridge/ tunnel

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 35975 bytes