Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 42.147, 93 24.454

Neat bridge. Larger than the other Canton Bridge Company bridges in our area. Longer span as well. Not sure if the larger frame is due to higher load carrying or longer span or both.

Photo 1:South bank looking east

Photo 2: Looking north

Photo 3: Plaque

Photo 4: Looking north

Photo 5:Bridge has been redecked recently. Vines have been cut that had been growing inside the frame

Photo 6: Looking south

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 33.262, 93 18.434

Photo's of west abutment. East abutment is gone.

Photo 1: taken from new bridge

Photo 2: Looking East. Concrete placed where deck surface used to be. Railing on approach in different

Photo 3: East abutment, railing

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS actual 37 37.648, 93 32.579

Photo 1: South side looking east. Note damage to railing

Photo 2: Inventory number?

Photo 3: South side railing damage

Photo 4: Water damage west bank, north side

Photo 5: North side looking east

Photo 6: Looking east

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo 7: East side looking north

Photo 8: Under looking north

Photo 9: South approach ramp and south support

Photo 10: Approach ramp, odd slight downward angle

Photo 11: Icy bluff, south/east side. No railing, only cable

Photo 12: Looking south

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Actual GPS 37 58,794 93 18.686

Regarding the questionm mark with bridge open? Maybe this is the deal. Road to the bridge is poorly designed. Road runs east/west, but actually runs north/south where the bridge is. Approach from the east/south is on top of a bluff, shaded by trees. The first photo shows the sign regarding the weather issues (facing west). From that photo one can see to the 90 degree right hand corner. Look carefully where the road fades away and snow is evident. that was a sheet of solid ice, due to low sunlight exposure. It might have snowed here a week or so ago and still hadn't melted. Road turns 90 degrees right and immediately drops sharply down and onto the bridge. It would be impossible to guide a car and aim it on solid ice to be properly aligned with the bridge.

Thinking back to the original days when the bridge was likely built, I cannot imagine a team of horses with a loaded wagon climbing the south hill, or going down it! This poor road design may preserve the bridge more than naything else, simply as this makes the entire road of limited use, with or without a new bridge.

I am guessing that this bridge is open at other times, pending only the weather. Deck is aged, but solid. The approach ramp (south bank) takes large loads when vehicles drop off the hill and bottom out on it. The approach ramp aims slightly downward and I am not entirely sure if that is a result of damage repair, or original design.

Photo 1: Looking west. Snow/ice in road, road turns sharply right as it drops out of sight and sharply goes down.

Photo 2: Looking south at the uphill on the bridge (this would be downhill after the corner.

Photo 3: Looking South

Photo 4: Side shot, looking south, west side of the bridge.

Photo 5: Looking south through bridge

Photo 6: Looking north. Note the downward angle of the approach ramp

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo 7: Lower joint, east end, north side where approach ramo meets bridge deck.

Photo 8: East Approach ramp, north side

Photo 9: East abutment, south side

Photo 10: Heading west

Photo 11: Deck wear and tear on south side of approach ramp. Deck seems to be wooden boards with asphalt on top. While we were there, water was dripping from beneath bridge, but surface was dry, which suggests that the boards are sitting in moisture a fair amount of the time.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

GPS 37 49.146, 93 37.310

Too many photo's, you pick the one's you prefer

Photo 1: Name Plate- 1908, Marcus Bridge?, and Iron Works?, Peoria, IL?

Photo 2: Heading East

Photo 3: North side, heading east

Photo 4: West Bank Abutment

Photo 5:Under looking East

Photo 6: Upper joint, north side, east end

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Randy Brush

I am remember the railroad bridge long time. The train was no longer use on bridge for rest of place. three truss bridge was demolished at Big Sioux River in East Sioux Falls, South Dakota. It was by Union Bridge Co. 1897. It track was removed.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday 17 Feb 2007 at 5:45 pm. Getting close to this bridge was no easy matter. I tried various routes on dirt roads & levee's before I found on dirt levee road near the Lock & Dam. As one approaches the rails, the road is posted "Private No Tresspassing" but it is not gated and you can drive right to the AR river bank at the west approach of the bridge. This is probably the road that would be used by the lift span operator, unless this process is completely automated. This railroad bridge is very long and gangly, and has multiple configurations. A locomotive was towing a long string of railcars through the bridge when I arrived. Since I got there at sunset and didn't have a tripod, my photos are a bit off, but there is a lot of bridge here, for sure. Well worth seeing.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren GIlmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

Photo #7: County inventory #?

Photo #8: Heading south

Photo #9: West side looking north

Photo 10: Heading north

Photo 11: Deck damage where approcah ramps meet bridge. Both lanes , both ends are in thnis condition. This channels water to cause the damage noted in photo #5

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Greg Hall/Darren Gilmore (cyclebay [at] aol [dot] com)

As always, I will post too many photo's and let you decide which ones should be used to document the bridge.

actual GPS 37 29.205, 93 15.845

Photo 1: West side looking south

Photo 2: West side looking south

Photo 3: Water damage to water drain areas/west side

Photo 4: East side looking South

Photo 5: Water damage where North ramp meets bridge deck

Photo 6: Note offset arches. Bridge is not quite square with the stream. East arch is more south than west arch is.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 20, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited the Tull Bridge on Saturday 17 Feb. This bridge would have intersected with the modern bridge on the west approach. The modern replacement bridge has a bronze plaque indicating it was built 2005 and they are 30 degrees apart from each other. The Tull bridge appears to be ready to be plucked off its piers by a crane from the replacement bridge. I'm glad this is not the case. The galvanized guardrails on the old bridge detract immensely from its character. I would suggest replacing these with period related iron. It will be a great place when developed as a park by the city, given its peculiar angle to the replacement bridge; which is now heavily grafittied. There was more traffic on this highway than I had anticipated - could have been because it was another mild winter day.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Bobby Lamb (bobbylamb [at] prodigy [dot] net)

I was born on the bayou within a few miles of this old bridge in 1947. I remember having to slow down as we crossed it. The timbers would creak and pop. The truck would rock back and forth with the rise and fall of the runners. Here and there we would see gaps in the planks and think about what it would be like if the bridge fell through or if we ran off it. That made for nightmares in later life.

There was an old railroad trestle that crossed the bayou not far away from the bridge. Once, we saw that the old train that ran between Star City and Gould and the trestle had crashed into the bayou.

Within a radius of about six or seven miles there were at least three other similar bridges that crossed the bayou. At some, the school bus would stop and let the children walk across the bridge before the bus crossed. It took a lot of effort to maintain these old bridges. But they were the kind that made a kid's heart pound as they approached them.

Bob Lamb, now in Pine Bluff, Arkanss.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 18 Feb 2007 at 5:30 pm. Had a little trouble locating it. There is a boat launch ramp next to it. A pickup truck and an ATV were parked on a side road on the flood plain. This is a long bridge and seems to be in pretty good shape except for missing running boards. A tributary creek merges nearby. Interesting use of hanger bars near the ends instead of full length criss-cross uprights. Pony truss on one approach. Remnants of a rope swing hangs from the upper truss. Noticed an auxillary culvert next to one abuttment with stacked flat rock facing. Silty/sandy banks. Dump truck loads of creek gravel/rock at both approach roads keep bridge closed to all but pedestrians.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Anon (Anon)

This is not a historic structure. It is not even eligible.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 18 Feb 2007 about 5 pm. The approaches have a top covering of what appears to be conveyor belt material about 2 to 3 ft. wide. There are missing running boards and several rotted holes in the decking. This bridge was so close to the modern replacement bridge, that I passed by it without seeing it till I came back across the replacement bridge. Was able to get photos from every side and from the replacement.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge 18 Feb 2007 about 4:00 pm. A mild winter day to be in the Ozark Nat'l Forest, after stopping at Mt. Magazine State Park. About 1" of water was flowing down the spillway, but there was a dry margin on either side to walk along. North approach is on a sharp curve. A small parking lot on the north end allows access to trail for hiking the perimeter of Cove Lake.

Posted February 19, 2007, by Donald L. Putman (dputman [at] netzero [dot] com)

I crossed this bridge going to and from Mena, Arkansas, to visit my relatives. This bridge was painted blue. It was a small truss, however a landmark. It's a shame to demolish it.

Posted February 18, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

The second span of this bridge was demolished sometime before 18 Feb 2007.

Posted February 16, 2007, by Anonymous

Interesting. I grew up in Lockport, Illinois. There is a lock on the canal there. We used to have two, through truss swing bridges there. One of them is mentioned on this web site. Also, the 135th street bridge mentioned in Romeoville is nicely preserved along the side of the canal now days. It is interesting to hear from a resident of another Lockport. I think there is a Lockport New York, also.

Posted February 16, 2007, by Thor

I thought this was a cool photo from the top of the Carew Tower in Cincinnati.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 686330 bytes

Posted February 15, 2007, by Mary Lynn

As a citizen of Lockport, I would like to state that this bridge needs to have the rust taken care of and needs to be repainted badly. A group of citizens, quite a while back, tried to scrape off as much of the rust as possible and then it was painted. This was done only on the thoroughfare section. We did not go on the outside of the bridge nor under the bridge.

It really needs to have a professional job done NOW to preserve this historic bridge.

Posted February 15, 2007, by Harvey Henkelman (makechoochoogonow (at) msn (dot) com)

A sad story indeed, but it seems as if America itself is ashamed of it's own history. Anything more than a week old would be razed if it were up to many people -- that's why America has little culture or tradition.

Posted February 15, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

The bridge rehab is on schedule and scheduled to open in September 2007. I'll be there!

Posted February 15, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

As I was driving in Dayton January 29, 2007. The bridge no longer exists.

Posted February 14, 2007, by betsy frauto (yahho [dot] dn)

you need pictures in the internet.

Posted February 14, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Those welded marks on the compression member are likely high water marks from floods in the region.

Posted February 13, 2007, by Susan Barker (subarker [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Enjoyed your website. Still have photos to review. I live in Maeystown. Are you aware we have 30 or so stone arch bridges in our county!

Susan

Posted February 13, 2007, by David Birckhead (david_birckhead [at] hotmail [dot] com)

These photos are ones I took on 4 Sept 06, in the Idaho town of Glenns Ferry where this bridge is located.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1356759 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1343853 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1373681 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1348448 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1364762 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1366738 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by James Adorno (adorno423 [at] aol [dot] com)

This bridge is scheduled for replacement in Spring of 2008, provided they can get the money. A group of concerned citizens is working currently to get the bridge listed on the NRHP.

Posted February 13, 2007, by Dan Reitmeyer (danreitmeyer [at] charter [dot] net)

This bridge has been totally rehabilitated and re-aligned to make a curve safer at the ends of the bridge

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 650637 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 600751 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by Dan Reitmeyer (danreitmeyer [at] charter [dot] net)

Repairs on the Boner road bridge are complete

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1499491 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1381527 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1385008 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken in 1997.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 37491 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here is a picture of the westernmost span that was taken after the rest of the bridge was demolished.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 39942 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Pictures taken in 2000.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 45715 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 41687 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken after the bridge was closed, in 1997.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 65599 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This picture was taken from the east end of the bridge in 1997. I assume the ramp was added for the filming of "Sling Blade".

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 63609 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here are a couple of snaps that I took in 1997 of this gone but not forgotten span. It sure was narrow!

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 60078 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 54682 bytes

Posted February 13, 2007, by J Lance (bugo [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here is a picture of this bridge taking in 1995. The road is former US 59 and at one time was also US 270.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 44746 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Jim Logan (jjimmi [at] gmail [dot] com)

all photod taken Jan 2007

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3278722 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 2960564 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3131786 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 3415121 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Kent Findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

The causway spans were replaced with precast concrete in 1997 and the truss and girderspans were rehabilitated in 1997. In the 60s a three lane sister bridge was built alongside to the east.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 4794011 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb. 2007 at 3:30 pm.

This bridge is at the very end of a county dirt road that may only be used by one person (farmer). Once you go over the bridge, the road abruptly ends at a cattle gate.

This Pony truss is different in construction than most. It is mostly bolted together but also has some riveting. The wooden guardrails have rotted away long ago and have never been replaced. The wooden decking and running boards are in good shape.

There is an old barking dog on the other side but not agressive. Whoever lives out there has their own historical bridge that is probably county maintained. I was sturdy to drive across.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb 2007 at 2:00 pm. Good pictures can be taken from the east or west ends and also from the adjacent marina.

This brige is poetry in motion as its spans loop accross Self Creek. Reminds me of a Slinky "walking" across the floor. Lake Greeson's water level was up when I visited.

Lake water was clean and blue and a couple of miles down Hwy 70 where the Little Missouri River enters Lake Greeson, there is a pretty Corps of Engineers campground named Star of the West.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 03 Feb. 2007 at 1:00 pm. This bridge has been bypassed by a modern bridge that is not near as attractive as the single concrete arch of the Old US 70 bridge.

Lot of graffeti on the substructural concrete spandrels. Even located an 20" BMX bicycle that has tumbled down the creek and whose bent wheels are clogged with leaf debris.

Clear running creek is shallow and tranquil. Guardrails are rusty but sound. Easy access to creek from eiher side.

Several vehicles drove accross as I was poking around in the creek bed. Usually I like to pick up a couple of flagstones from the gravel bars; good stepping stones for the garden.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 25 Nov. 2006 at 2:30 pm. I drove around a bit looking for it and in the process found an interesting low bridge a couple of miles upstream on the same creek.

This is an a different use of a Pony truss especially on such a wide location; although creek is shallow. Some locals were gathering rocks below the bridge for a home patio. The lady talked about cringing every time her school bus rumbled along that bridge.

Seemed sound to me as I heard two vehicles clattering across. Nice broad gravel bar beneath bridge - great spot for picnicing.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Kent Findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

I am suprised a bridge like this exists on long Island

Picture 1 is from the east looking west and picture 2 is the wooden deck

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 5831149 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.21, 5788888 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 23 Jan. 2007 at 4:00 pm. Very attractive setting on a slow bayou. One can drive across and go to a turn around area and park.

This is a nice replica of a covered bridge. The supporting girders are large steel I-beams, otherwise its constructed of all wood components; 'cept the roof shingles.

There is a gazebo upstream and another low footbridge downstream. A hiking/jogging trail starts into the woods on the north side.

Romantic feel, almost want to uncork a bottle of wine and slice up some cheese.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pic of current bridge with old bridge from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 802848 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Pics available from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

View attachment #1 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 448533 bytes

View attachment #3 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 605263 bytes

View attachment #5 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

View attachment #6 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pics available at http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 1266493 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 972372 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1098452 bytes

View attachment #4 (PC bitmap data, Windows 3.x format, 1760 x 1168 x 24, 6167094 bytes)

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

Pics available from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 47082 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 49263 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, 78862 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)
Posted February 12, 2007, by kent findley (kent [dot] findley [at] francisalee [dot] com)

I was on the way back from upstate and had a little time so I stop and took this picture.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 833772 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Pics of bridge from http://www.dot.state.oh.us/

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 42057 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 53528 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous
Posted February 12, 2007, by Anonymous

Picture of bike trail under bridge/ tunnel

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.02, 35975 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by brett lowe (brettlowe48 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

My grandpa Kenneth Lowe had these same exact pictures in his house.I found them after he passed on.I find this kind of stuff pretty cool because my family came from rutledge,Missouri.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Tom S. (thomass [at] nc [dot] rr [dot] com)

This bridge is in the middle of William B. Umstead State Park in the east side of Raleigh NC. I walked about 2 miles to get these pictures. I entered the park from the south, Reedy Creek entrance, but I could have parked near Sycamore Lake from the north enterence and had about the same walk. If I had a bike or a horse, I could have rode to the bridge. This bridge is open to foot, bike and horse traffic. NC1647 is called Graylyn Trail in the park and is a dirt road. Two other trail will take you to this bridge, Company Mill Spur Trail and Sycamore Trail.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1136238 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1102313 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 1099325 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Cecil (cneigh01 [at] baker [dot] edu)

This is the triple locks of the Walhonding Canal, a 25 mile feeder for the Ohio And Erie Canal

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday, 10 Feb. 2007, at 11:00 am.

I have been told by a resident of Clinton that this bridge will be demolished when a new bridge and road cut are built to straighten out the curves on Hwy 65.

This bridge has been previously widened as there are additional piers on the downstream side. The cantilevered iron work substructure is hardly noticeable as one drives across. Well built with riveted components.

Pilgrims Pride has a poultry processing plant about a mile upstream from the bridge. Swallows have built 100's of mud nest pasted to the concrete underside. The river eventually merges with Greers Ferry Lake.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday, 10 Feb. 2007, at 2 pm.

Like all wooden deck bridges, the boards rumble when crossing but its plenty sturdy. The center span no longer swivels, but the steel casters that permitted pivoting are intact on the center pier.

Underneath this bridge by the western abuttment, there were carcasses of at leat 10 geese or large ducks; along with your standard deer hunters discards.

About 1/4 mile upriver is an old railroad bridge that also used to pivot on center column. The operator house and some mechanism is still visible and I believe the rail line is in current service.

At one end of this bridge is a tall rusty water tank and an incinerator stack from an abandoned plant.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday, 10 Feb 2007, at approx 3 pm.

Tubular iron gates on each end restrict vehicle access.

Wooden decking has deteriorated, but the running boards appear to be in usable condition.

Large sheets of plexiglass have been dumped at one approach and there is some older graffiti on the large truss member where the plaque is located.

One curious thing noticed was that on the left side main truss there were several dates stick welded to the steel member (possible from welding repairs - 1915, 1916, 1927 & 1932). They appear to have been done by the same person. There is another plate at the crown of the bridge (painted red) that reads "National Historical Bridge Built 1909). The letters and date are formed from welding beads, similar the welding repair dates on the truss. All probably done by the same welder.

Bridge approaches are viney & weedy, making it difficult to get a good profile view. Banks are slick and debris ladden from recent rise.

This bridge is within sight of a large electrical generating plant that has the appearance of being a nuclear facility with two massive cooling towers.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at 6 pm on Saturday, 10 Feb 2007. The sun had already set so I had to use my flash to get any kind of photo. The wing rail on the right abutment has been sheared off possibly from vehicle collision.

This bridge is also non-descript from the top deck other than the concrete railings that are of 1930's vintage.

It was dark when I arrive on the scene of this structure and I didn't feel comfortable bushwacking to the creek bed; also being unsure of my footing in unfamiliar, potentially slippery setting.

Bridge is located approx 15 miles from central Batesville. Creek is not signed, so you need to start looking for it shortly after passing through Bethesda.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on Saturday 10 Feb 2007 about 4 pm. This is one of those bridges that you can not see the substructure by driving over it, since the approaches are straight. Recent high water has left the surrounding ground muddy, but there was plenty of nice white sand near the banks. Powerlines obstruct at most photo angles. This bridge has nice baluster concrete railings. Attached are serveal views that will provide a good visual especially since no photos have been assigned to this bridge. Very nice architectural form is evident. Bridge is located on Hwy 69 Spur a couple of miles from center of Batesville.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Harvey Henkelman (MakeChooChooGoNow (at) msn (dot) com)

Outstanding photos, especially the aerial shot taken from the kite.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Scott Nazelrod (scott5114 [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge is referred to as the "Old Bridge" in Washington.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard, 599363 bytes

Posted February 12, 2007, by Scott Nazelrod (scott5114 [at] gmail [dot] com)

This bridge is currently closed.

Posted February 12, 2007, by John P. Kohlberg (iselinshop [at] mn [dot] rr [dot] com)

Just want to clarify things based on the previous comment. This is a GM&O era bridge across the Cache Channel. I have a photo dated May 21, 1965, taken by the GM&O, of this bridge.

Posted February 12, 2007, by Beth (edenton [at] gmail [dot] com)

My family and I were regular visitors to the Swinging Bridge both before and after it's collapse in 1989. Cleburne County in the late 80s was not all that exciting a place - so whenever we went to visit our grandparents there, we'd drive out and take some photos, and sometimes eat at the cafe.

While I feel sorry for the students who died at the bridge, and have sympathy for their friends and families, the bridge's destruction was a senseless act of vandalism. I was eleven in 1989, but even then I was cognizant of not only the respect that historical places ought to be treated with, but also the common sense one uses around antiques!

Posted February 11, 2007, by S Johnson (sbayberrie2 [at] aol [dot] com)

3rd grade class project

Posted February 11, 2007, by Steve McVicker (Donner337 [at] yahoo [dot] com)

Rest in peace my old friend. I too wish i had the gas money i spent traveling you. Now just like my high School sweethearts of the early eighties, gone are you, but with pleasant memories. You were narrow scary and worn in 82 when i used you the most, your rebar was showing through the concrete then. I used you until 1991 when i left St.louis, no longer do you stand in honor of the brave men of steel that shaped your being.

Posted February 11, 2007, by Robert L. Elder (Bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

This five panel, pin connected Pratt through truss is located on Spring Valley Road approximately 2.75 miles north and 1 mile east of New Lancaster, Kansas. Both photos were taken in October 2004

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 11, 2007, by Robert L. Elder (bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

Correction. The photo was taken in November 2002, not October, 2004

Posted February 11, 2007, by Robert L. Elder (bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

Correction. The photos were taken in November 2002, not October, 2004

Posted February 10, 2007, by Anonymous

Great Story! Many people read this site and you woudn't know it...but a story like yours is a great one.

Posted February 10, 2007, by james mccray (jamesinslocomb [at] yahoo [dot] com)

I took two pictures of this bridge in the summer of 2005. My wife, a friend, and I was going to Billings to pick up another friend who was going to be a summer missionary in Canada. We went through Great Falls and stopped at the bridge. The bridge is in the process of being remodeled and it will soon be in operation again! Only, this time it will be a walking bridge. Anyway, the picture of the 10th Street Bridge is taken from the south side of the river. The current remodeled portion of the bridge is on the north side.

Webmaster's note: The photo that was here has been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 10, 2007, by Ruth Reynolds (ruthmusic [at] yahoo [dot] com)

This bridge was replaced in 2005. The old bridge was relocated to a lake development somewhere in the Lake of the Ozarks.

Posted February 10, 2007, by Robert L. Elder (bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

This bridge, located on US 75 immediately north of Burlington, Kansas, was replaced by a modern concrete bridge in September 2006. This picture was taken from a nearby gravel road in November 2004 as construction for the new bridge was just beginning.

Webmaster's note: The photo that was here has been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 10, 2007, by Robert Elder (Bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

I am relatively confident that these photos are of the same bridge as #610587 but I am not completely certain.

The bridge in this picture is located on Old KC Road (Old US 169) near the southern city limits of Paola, Kansas. This would be about 4 miles south and 11.1 miles west of Louisburg. The photographed bridge is a five span open-spandrel concrete bridge which crosses Bull Creek as well as a railroad line. Because this bridge is surrounded by overgrowth it is almost impossible to photograph or view from any direction. These photos were taken in November of 2004. If anybody knows if this bridge is or is not #610587 that would be great.

Posted February 9, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here's the location of this bridge, east of Bradford.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 93422 bytes

Posted February 9, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here's a distance shot of this bridge, only two weeks after Fred's pics.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 1133008 bytes

Posted February 9, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here's the Danville-Mickles in the wintertime with the water up.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 950420 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 1019247 bytes

Posted February 9, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

Here is this bridge in the wintertime

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 1123639 bytes

Posted February 9, 2007, by Daniel Arnold (oak_grove99 [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge still exists, but it's in rough shape on the old U.S. 67 route.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 1830246 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.2, 1540616 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 97350 bytes

Posted February 8, 2007, by Carol Anderheggen (carolmaeray [at] cox [dot] net)

I live near this bridge, actually about 30 seconds from where the photo was taken. I love this bridge. When the state was replacing the cabling in 2000 they announced that the decorative lights were not going to be replaced. I and many others wrote letters to newspapers, historic preservation agencies, and government agencies.

We were successful in having new lights installed. The tradition had been that the lights were lit only on national holidays. When I came back from NYC in October 2001 (I had been working the Red Cross response to 9/11) the lights were on at night and have been ever since.

Those lights lifted my spirit that night and have ever since!

Posted February 8, 2007, by Brian and Jennifer Roos (dragon8warrior [at] gmail [dot] com)

This one had the remnants of an older bridge and the original road next to it. We walked down the old road to the water to get a closer view of the current bridge.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 149083 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 149553 bytes

Posted February 8, 2007, by Brian and Jennifer Roos (dragon8warrior [at] gmail [dot] com)

I don't know which one was more interesting, the Bridge of Lions or the temporary vertical lift bridge. We took a local scenic boat cruise to get an up close view through the channel.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 143719 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 137750 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 160382 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 146630 bytes

Posted February 8, 2007, by Brian and Jennifer Roos (dragon8warrior [at] gmail [dot] com)

Sorry we couldn't get a better shot of this one but we were on our way to the airport.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 147779 bytes

Posted February 8, 2007, by Brian and Jennifer Roos (dragon8warrior [at] gmail [dot] com)

It looked like they were constructing a causeway to eliminate the need for this really interesting bascule pair.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 153116 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 141851 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 136253 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 140845 bytes

Posted February 8, 2007, by Brian and Jennifer Roos (dragon8warrior [at] gmail [dot] com)

This one was really neat to drive across!

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 137643 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 137736 bytes

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, EXIF standard 2.1, 147743 bytes

Posted February 7, 2007, by Alex Peck (a [dot] peck [at] mchsi [dot] com)

C. 1910 postcard of the Blakeman's Bridge, Old Rt. 130, Coles Co., IL

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 39231 bytes

Posted February 6, 2007, by Anonymous

Are they planning to tear the whole upper road deck out?

Posted February 5, 2007, by Tom Hoffman (tehoffm [at] hotmail [dot] com)

This bridge was closed recently. The new SR 450 bridge was built years ago. I guess the county did not want to maintain the bridges use for vehicles anymore.

Posted February 5, 2007, by Patrick Sparks (psparks [at] sparksengineering [dot] com)

The 1881/1910 Hays Street Bridge is a viaduct consisting of two wrought iron truss spans (one Phoenix Whipple 225-ft span, and one Pratt 130-ft span), and approximately 1000-LF of concrete approaches.

In 1910, the City of San Antonio required the Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. (eventually part of Southern Pacific) to construct a viaduct over the railroad tracks at Hays Street. The railway company relocated the two truss spans from elsewhere on its lines.

Records of the Phoenix Bridge Company archived at the Hagley Library in Wilmington, Delaware show that the Whipple truss dates from 1881 and was reconstructed from one or more salvaged spans over the Nueces River west of San Antonio. These records include entries in the company’s customer index as well as copies of the 1910 repair shop drawings showing replacement joint blocks, bearing seats, and lateral bracing struts.

The Whipple truss span is a Phoenix patent design using the now rare Phoenix segmental wrought iron columns with cast-iron joint blocks. The Pratt span has Phoenix-branded components, including the floor beams. Both spans were widened in 1910 from about 16-feet to the current 25-feet.

The bridge is planned for rehabilitation as a bicycle and pedestrian facility by the City of San Antonio, using a Transportation Enhancement grant from the Texas Department of Transportation. Sparks Engineering, Inc. is the design consultant for the project. Plans and specifications were completed in November 2006 and the project is scheduled to begin construction in the spring of 2007.

Uploaded file: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, 1076202 bytes

Posted February 4, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge at sunset on 4 Feb '07 so the photos I took could be better with daylight conditions. It can be photographed from the modern bridge just 100 yds. downstream. Also can get photos from the upstream bank from some large rocks that allow you to get a good view. The approach is blocked with chain link fencing and there's plenty of overgrowth. Bridge is posted "Danger-No Tresspassing". I couldn't tell if the opposite approach was blocked off.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 4, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge on 4 Feb '07. Had a hard time locating it and never really got close to it. I turned right at the water plant utility building and then the next left into a semi-dump site. The road to the left of the utility building was rutted real bad and sloppy so I could make it in my car. The photos I took were from about 100 yds. away.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 4, 2007, by Fred Garcia (fandsgarcia [at] gmail [dot] com)

Visited this bridge 4 Feb '07. It can be best seen from the modern bridge 50 yds. upstream on Hwy 300. There is a locked gate on either side to restrict driving close to it, but you can pull off the road to park on the access and walk 50 yds. to cross over it. Can get good photos from the under the modern bridge.

Webmaster's note: The photos that were here have been incorporated into the main site.

Posted February 4, 2007, by Robert L. Elder (Bass-tbn [at] ku [dot] edu)

This is a Reverse Parker through truss. This may possibly be the only example of Reverse Parker in existance.